The Neoanalytic theory is very reminiscent of Freud’s theory
but varies to some extent. The theory does not look to add new techniques but
rather looks at new ways of discussing the techniques. Much of the theory comes
from Freud’s daughter Anna Freud. They typically emphasize the relationship
between the therapist and the client as curative in and of itself; this is
beyond what is gained from transference analysis. There are four major
categories of the neoanalytic approach: Ego Psychology, Object relations, Self
Psychology, and Relational Psychoanalysis. Ego Psychology was created by Anna
Freud and derived from much of her father’s work. Heinz Hartmann, a client of
Freud’s, also played a significant role in the development of Ego Psychology. Theorists
kept Freud’s model of the id, ego, and superego but emphasizes the ego
functioning. Some saw the ego as more of a need to control id impulses bother
others believed the ego developed independently from the id. Theorists accept
Freud’s original model of a healthy person but add that health is observed in
the quality of the ego’s adaptation to the environment. They also follow the
Oedipal complex but place an emphasis on the early stages of life and the
environment around the infant. Object Relations focuses on Freud’s concept of
the target of instincts. Melanie Klein, R.D. Fairburn, and Donald Winnicott are
some of the most significant theorists with the development of Object
Relations. OR differs by rejecting the classic drive theory and argues that we
seek objects instead, typically other people. But it is not a means of
satisfying our instinctual drives. Objects are key in this theory but the key
object is the internal object which is seen as a psychological structure formed
early in life through the internalization of interactions with important
others. The internal representation of relationships is known as the bipolar
interapsychic representation, which is broken into three categories: the image
of the self, an image of the other person, and associated emotions. Self-Psychology
is the development of the self and was founded by Heinz Kohut. A key term is
selfobjects which refers to parts of one self and individuals in the
environment that are relevant to ones self. SP rejects many of Freud’s concepts
of a healthy individual such someone who is heterosexual and the Oedipus
complex. According to SP, the problems people face in life is self-related and
can be traced back to deficits in early experiences with caregivers. There are
three key dysfunctions with SP: the psychoses, narcissistic personality
disorders, and structural conflict neuroses. With Psychoses, the basic self has
not been developed. With NPD, there is a basic sense of self-formed but there
are significant complications with it. The individual has developed neither the
idealizing nor the grandiose aspects of oneself. Those with structural-conflict
neuroses are those with problem coming from the phallic stage of development.
At its core, the motor of psychological disturbance is a result of anxiety from
faulty parenting. Relational Psychoanalysis is the most complicated of the four
and it was founded by Sandor Franzecki. Harry Stack Sullivan is also considered
a key individual in its development. At times, it is used to describe a
contemporary view within psychoanalysis rather than a theory itself. Other
times it refers to a specific theoretical approach, psychic structure is
derived from the individual’s relations with other people. RP theorists will
often rely on developmental theory, this theory emphasizes that early
interactions are believed to lead to the development of oneself. Analysts are
usually influenced by more than one approach in the neoanalytic theory. The
four areas are overall less broad than a traditional analytic theory.
Psychoanalysis session part 2
In this video, the therapist is using the psychoanalysis
technique of dream analysis. The woman is describing a dream to her therapist
that she had about being in a river. She spoke about how she saw her professor,
whom she recently ran into, but also her family along the shore. She said that
her professor was the only one calling out to her. These are all forms of manifest
content. The therapist then connects these into latent content. He helps her
realize she felt the same way in the river in the dream as she did in the
street when she saw her professor. He also points out how her professor knew
her prior to her family, indicating why he was likely the only one calling out.
Object relations family sessions
I believe Pam is showing signs of the splitting technique in
the video. Pam’s brother committed suicide and is having a difficult time
dealing with it. They were both very close and she feels so has no one to talk
to now. Now, Pam will always sit in-between her parents in the middle. Whether
it be dinner, watching TV, or even in the session shown, Pam is always
in-between her parents. Pam is splitting the good and bad parts of her family
life. She surrounds herself with her parents to keep herself aware that they
are still there and internalizes her brother who is now gone.
No comments:
Post a Comment